Hoi,<br>I have been bold and asked for a review.<br>Thanks,<br> GerardM<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_November_11#Creole_.28markup.29">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_November_11#Creole_.28markup.29</a><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Chuck Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chuck@chucksmith.de">chuck@chucksmith.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Apparently there are two ways to get it undeleted. One way is to "be<br>
bold" and create it again. Another way is to list it on the deletion<br>
review page at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review</a><br>
for further discussion. Being a Wikipedia admin and the main<br>
organizer for Wiki Creole, it probably would not appear kosher for me<br>
to make such a request, but I will happily join in the discussion if<br>
it seems to fit.<br>
<br>
Please let us know if you decide to put it up for review.<br>
<br>
Best wishes,<br>
<font color="#888888">Chuck<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:34 AM, kjx <<a href="mailto:kjx@mcs.vuw.ac.nz">kjx@mcs.vuw.ac.nz</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I would be disappointed if the effort invested into creole were not<br>
>> recognized, and the outcomes not recorded. Is there someone on this list<br>
>> with an inclination for primary research that would like to take on this<br>
>> task?<br>
><br>
> Hmm. I would have though this paper was more than enough:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1296951.1296966" target="_blank">http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1296951.1296966</a><br>
><br>
> WikiCreole:: a common wiki markup<br>
> International Symposium on Wikis archive<br>
> Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis table of contents<br>
> Montreal, Quebec, Canada<br>
><br>
> Was there a discussion period before the article was deleted?<br>
> If so, did anyone join in to argue for retention?<br>
> If there was no discussion period, why not?<br>
><br>
> James_______________________________________________<br>
><br>
> wiki-standards mailing list. <a href="mailto:wiki-standards@wikisym.org">wiki-standards@wikisym.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.wikisym.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wiki-standards" target="_blank">http://www.wikisym.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wiki-standards</a><br>
><br>
> For the wiki-research, wiki-standards, wikisym-announce mailing lists,<br>
> please see:<br>
> <a href="http://www.wikisym.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://www.wikisym.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<br>
wiki-standards mailing list. <a href="mailto:wiki-standards@wikisym.org">wiki-standards@wikisym.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.wikisym.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wiki-standards" target="_blank">http://www.wikisym.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wiki-standards</a><br>
<br>
For the wiki-research, wiki-standards, wikisym-announce mailing lists, please see:<br>
<a href="http://www.wikisym.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://www.wikisym.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>